Cases 51 - 60 of 2,724
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plastics NYC LLC v. Plastics Boutique LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plastics NYC LLC
Defendant:
Plastics Boutique LLC and Angel Adams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Rugged Cross Hunting Blinds, LLC v. DBR Finance, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02231
Plaintiff:
Rugged Cross Hunting Blinds, LLC
Defendant:
DBR Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ResMed Corp. v. Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
ResMed Corp.
Defendant:
Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Vanocur Refractories, LLC v. Fosbel, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
Vanocur Refractories, LLC
Defendant:
Fosbel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. Smokablez 105 LLC et al.
as 3:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Smokablez 105 LLC doing business as Smokablez and Morad Nagi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
GS Holistic, LLC v. Moes Smokes Inc., et al
as 3:2023cv02041
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Moes Smokes Inc. doing business as Moe's Smokes and Morad Naji
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wright v. Impulse Training, LLC
as 5:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Brittany Wright
Defendant:
Impulse Training, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, LLC v. GPRS Holdings, LLC et al.
as 3:2023cv01919
Plaintiff:
Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, LLC
Defendant:
GPRS Holdings, LLC and Ground Penetrating Radar Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv02106
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
