Cases 61 - 70 of 278
CHEN v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
ZHONG CHENG CHEN
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, Director KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
COLLINS v. SHUTTERED VENUES OPERATIONS GRANT
as 2:2022cv01310
Plaintiff:
NATASHA COLLINS
Defendant:
SHUTTERED VENUES OPERATIONS GRANT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Doe v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jane Doe v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Connie Nolan and others
CASCIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CASCIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
YAN v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
JIU AN YAN
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, Director KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHENG v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
XIU CHENG ZHENG
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ONE STOP FRESH DELI, LLC v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
ONE STOP FRESH DELI, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
ZHAO et al v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
XUE JIAO ZHAO, XUAN LIN, FAN LIN and others
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AHMED v. JADDOU, et al
as 2:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
EHSAN AHMED
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
