Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 97,448
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff: DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant: T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
United States of America v. Peel
as 24-3062
Defendant: DONALD J. PEEL, Steven Wrede, Donald Billson and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chaarawi v. Gonzalez, et al.
as 24-3073
Defendant: SHARMIR GONZALEZ, Shamir Gonzalez, MARCUS ENSIEDJIAN and others
Plaintiff: WALID M. CHAARAWI
Lawless v. United States of America
as 24-3075
Plaintiff: RICHARD R. LAWLESS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McLean v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 24-3086
Plaintiff: LENROY MCLEAN
Defendant: PHILLIP GUTIERREZ, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, FNU HERNANDEZ, Office Staff, in his/her individual capacity, FNU JENKINS, Unit Manager, in his/her individual and official capacity and others
Pena, et al. v. International Medical Devices, Inc., et al.
as 24-3061
Plaintiff: EDWARD PENA and BRANDON MILLER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICES, INC., MENOVA INTERNATIONAL, INC., GESIVA MEDICAL, LLC and others
Estate of Jotena Carter, et al. v. Cambridge Sierra Holdings, LLC
as 24-3071
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF JOTENA CARTER, ROBBI CARTER, TRACI SCOTT and others
Defendant: CAMBRIDGE SIERRA HOLDINGS, LLC
United States of America v. Lillard
as 24-3058
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LONNIE LILLARD
Borden v. DOJ - United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 24-3072
Plaintiff: RONALD L. BORDEN
Defendant: DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Case #1, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Case #1, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Case #2 and others
Emil v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3080
Petitioner: RODNEY L. EMIL
Respondent: WILLIAM GITTERE, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and TIMOTHY FILSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?