Cases 61 - 70 of 825
EGAN v. WALGREEN CO
as 5:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE EGAN
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BENTLEY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP (DELAWARE)
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
LORETTA BENTLEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP (DELAWARE) and ABC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
FARMER v. ABBOTT et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
GLADYS FARMER
Defendant:
BLAKE ABBOTT, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MILLER et al v. CVS PHARMACY INC
as 5:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
LYNN MILLER, DEPUTY CHARLES MILLER and CHARLES MILLER
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY INC, GEORGIA CVS PHARMACY LLC, SCP 2007-C27-019 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KNOWLES et al v. INGLES MARKETS INCORPORATED
as 5:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KNOWLES and SHELLEY KNOWLES
Defendant:
INGLES MARKETS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BELL v. TIFT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL et al
as 7:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
TONYEL Y BELL
Defendant:
TIFT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL and TIFT GENERAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVIS v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC
as 7:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
LINDA DAVIS
Defendant:
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HILL v. VARIETY WHOLESALERS INC
as 5:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIC HILL
Defendant:
VARIETY WHOLESALERS INC doing business as MAXWAY INC doing business as JOHN DOE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
VAUGHAN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP d/b/a WAL-MART
as 7:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
DAVID VAUGHAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP doing business as WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
