Cases 61 - 70 of 641
FORLINES et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv00087
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE FORLINES and CHARLES B. FORLINES
Defendant:
ETHICON ENDO SURGERY INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 7:2020cv00053
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
BUFFY BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ et al v. PRODUCTION SERVICE COMPANY INC et al
as 1:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MARTINEZ and ALEXIS MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PRODUCTION SERVICE COMPANY INC and Superior Machine Works
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROFT-BAILEY v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 7:2020cv00066
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA ANN CROFT-BAILEY
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL et al v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 5:2020cv00119
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
EMMA POWELL and RICHARD W POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GINES v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 7:2020cv00051
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ANGEL GINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEASLEY v. BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC et al
as 4:2020cv00070
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC and C R BARD INC
Plaintiff:
RONNIE L BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 5:2020cv00121
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEJESUS v. C R BARD INCORPORATED, et al.
as 4:2020cv00055
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Martin DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 7:2020cv00052
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
