Cases 61 - 70 of 13,962
Brooks v. District Attorney Joshua Judd
as 2:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
District Attorney Joshua Judd and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Repp et al
as 2:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ambibe Collins
Defendant:
J. Repp and Jaymie Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Jose Navarrete, William Hutchings, Jeniffer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas v. Cardella et al
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Raymond Paul Rosas
Defendant:
Cardella, Henley, Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earley v. Doctor Mental Health et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Earley
Defendant:
Doctor Mental Health, C.O., Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Centeno v. Ballou et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Gerold Centeno
Defendant:
Erika Ballou and Heather Ungermann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santistevan v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jerry Santistevan
Defendant:
Megan Thompson, Michael Giles, Stefany Miley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitesell v. Nye County Sherriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
John Tony Whitesell
Defendant:
Nye County Sherriffs Office and Serenity Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
