Cases 71 - 80 of 1,203
Patrick Donnelly v. ProPharma Group Topco LLC
as 23-1991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK K. DONNELLY
Defendant / Appellee:
PROPHARMA GROUP TOPCO LLC
Michael Owens v. PA Minority Business Development Authority of the, et al
as 23-1896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE OWENS
Defendant / Appellee:
PA MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA, JOHN S. PICCONI, TOM WOLFE and others
Defendant:
SBA OFFICIALS, Attorney, Mid Penn Legal Services, Harrisburg, PA and STEVEN W. SIMPSON, Attorney, Mid Penn Legal Services, Harrisburg, PA
TZE Global Dis Ticaret AS v. Papers Unlimited Inc
as 23-2024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TZE GLOBAL DIS TICARET AS
Defendant / Appellant:
PAPERS UNLIMITED INC
Cara Rowland v. BISSELL Homecare Inc
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARA ROWLAND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
BISSELL HOMECARE INC
TZE Global Dis Ticaret AS v. Papers Unlimited Inc
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TZE GLOBAL DIS TICARET AS
Defendant / Appellant:
PAPERS UNLIMITED INC
Tomas Bombadil & CO. v. Gail Gustafson & CO.
as 23-2141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMAS G. BOMBADIL, & CO.
Defendant / Appellee:
GAIL E. GUSTAFSON, & CO.
Glen Fallin v. Michael Lloyd, et al
as 23-1824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN M. FALLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL LLOYD, In His Individual Capacity. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc. and CEVA LOGISTICS US INC, A Delaware Corporation
Maxlite Inc v. ATG Electronics Inc, et al
as 23-1719
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAXLITE INC, formerly known as SK AMERICA, INC. doing business as MAXLITE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATG ELECTRONICS INC and JAMES D. STEEDLY
Defendant / Appellant:
SOPHIA C. GALLEHER and MATTHEW KIM
Ares Trading SA v. Dyax Corp
as 23-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARES TRADING SA
Defendant / Appellee:
DYAX CORP
Laura Catena, et al v. NVR Inc
as 23-1642
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURA CATENA and GREGORY NOVOTNY
Defendant / Appellant:
NVR INC, TDBA Heartland Homes of PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
