Cases 71 - 80 of 286
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co v. Permanent Easement for 7.053 A, et al
as 17-3700
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 7.053 ACRES, PERMANENT OVERLAY EASEMENT FOR 1.709 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 8.551 ACRES IN MILFORD AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIPS, PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS
Defendant - Appellant:
KING ARTHUR ESTATES and RIOTHAMUS CORP, General Partner of King Estates c/o Ernest Bertuzzi President
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line v. Permanent Easement, et al
as 17-3521
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CO LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.59 ACRES TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 5.45 ACRES AND TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR 2.12 ACRES IN PINE GROVE TOWNSHIP SCHUYLKILL COUNTY PA TAX PARCEL NUMBER 21-04-0016.000 361 CHAPEL DRIVE PINE GROVE PINE GROVE TOWNSHIP SCHUYLKILL COUNT
Defendant - Appellant:
RYAN J. REGEC
Bayview Loan Servicing LLC v. Reza Farzan, et al
as 17-3439
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
REZA FARZAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC, as nominee for American Mortgage Network, Inc., other as nominee for American Mortgage Network, Inc.
Columbia Gas Transmission LLC v. An Easement ot Construct Opera, et al
as 17-3312
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA JEAN YETTER, AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20 INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ACROSS PROPERTIES IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, OWNED BY ANGELO QUARTURE, JAMES YETTER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NANCY N. NERNBERG, CAROL SOVCHEN, Parcel ID 600-007-00-00-0054-00 and 600-007-00-00-0056-00 and TERRY KUBACKA, Parcel ID 600-007-00-00-0056-00
KEB Hana Bank USA v. Red Mansion LLC
as 17-3195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEB HANA BANK USA, a national banking association
Defendant - Appellant:
RED MANSION LLC, doing business as Naomi Village Resort
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
