Cases 71 - 80 of 10,346
Elianna Uribe v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Elianna Cortes Uribe
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jason Coady v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Jason Coady
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Donna Newell v. Martin O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Donna Newell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stephanie Rochelle Allen v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rochelle Allen
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mick Spitalnick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02201
Plaintiff:
Mick Spitalnick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Blanca Rosa Aguilera v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Blanca Rosa Aguilera
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Andreea Caterina Gomez v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Andreea Caterina Gomez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lorena Vega v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Lorena Vega
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Terence Dawson v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Terence Dawson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Billie Pickett v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Billie Pickett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
