Cases 71 - 80 of 276,823
Villalobos et al v. D2C, LLC
as 5:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Dinorath Villalobos and Ezequiel Palomino
Defendant:
D2C, LLC doing business as Univision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Madsen, et al. v. Jacoby, et al.
as 24-2983
Plaintiff:
JOHN MADSEN, STEPHAN LAKE ADVENTURES, LLC and STEPHAN LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
RUSSELL LEE JACOBY, LAURA MAE JACOBY, KAYLEE LAMAE JACOBY and others
Singh v. Garland
as 24-2959
Petitioner:
GAGANDEEP SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
as 24-2978
Plaintiff:
PETER SCHUMAN and WILLIAM COPLIN
Defendant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ATMEL CORPORATION and ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Li, et al. v. Arcsoft, Inc., et al.
as 24-2964
Plaintiff:
LEI LI, STRONG WEALTH INVESTMENT LIMITED and PACIFIC SMILE LIMITED
Defendant:
ARCSOFT, INC. and MICHAEL DENG
Garvie v. Bennett
as 24-2965
Petitioner:
EUGENE BRIAN GARVIE
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Frerichs v. City of Spokane Police Department
as 24-2977
Plaintiff:
JARED A FRERICHS
Defendant:
CITY OF SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 48 v. Rosendin Electric, Inc.
as 24-2967
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 48
Defendant:
ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC.
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2976
Plaintiff:
GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant:
CLALLAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALEX SCHODOWSKI, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge, DAVE NEUPERT, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
