Cases 71 - 80 of 913
Deligdish v. Bender
as 6:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Craig K. Deligdish
Defendant:
David Bender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dershowitz v. Cable News Network, Inc.
as 0:2020cv61872
Plaintiff:
Alan Dershowtiz
Defendant:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Leigh v. Leigh
as 0:2023cv60791
Plaintiff:
Mandy G Leigh and Mandy G. Leigh
Defendant:
Roberto Martin Leigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Leigh v. Leigh
as 0:2023cv60792
Plaintiff:
Mandy G Leigh and Mandy G. Leigh
Defendant:
Roberto Martin Leigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Pulte v. Jones
as 9:2023cv80216
Plaintiff:
William J Pulte and William J. Pulte
Defendant:
Brandon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mil Mujeres, Inc. v. Rubic, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv14056
Plaintiff:
Mil Mujeres, Inc.
Defendant:
Rubic, LLC and Kateryna Panova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Schottenstein et al v. Schottenstein-Pattap
as 1:2023cv20604
Plaintiff:
Evan Schottenstein and Avi Schottenstein
Defendant:
Cathryn Rebecca Schottenstein-Pattap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 1:2023cv21315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Bar, Texas Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Depaco v. Trust In News Unipessoal., LDA et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Caesar Depaco
Defendant:
TRUST IN NEWS UNIPESSOAL LDA, MAFALDA ANJOS and MIGUEL CARVALHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Rothenberg v. FedEx Corporation
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rothenberg
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
