Cases 71 - 80 of 8,341
Martin Akerman v. USA
as 23-5229
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martin Akerman
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
SHEPHARD v. HOPKINS et al
as 1:2023cv03129
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOHN HOPKINS, DENNIS KONICKI, ARRON REGGINAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
as 1:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
ROY JACKSON
Defendant:
ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03039
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ ZAPATA
as 1:2023cv03320
Petitioner:
JUAN J. HERNANDEZ ZAPATA
Respondent:
WILLIAMSBURG CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Rudometkin, et al v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-5218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David J. Rudometkin, Corry P. Brooks and Robert L. Barnett, III, and others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander L. Driskill
Defendant / Appellee:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his capacity as the Secretary of Defense
MARTINEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2023cv03118
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MARTINEZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, R.K. DELMAR, CAWANA PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03121
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
