Cases 71 - 80 of 7,202
Elia v. NYS Police Troop E
as 6:2024cv06120
Plaintiff:
Austin M. Elia
Defendant:
NYS Police Troop E
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulton v. USA
as 6:2024cv06119
Petitioner:
James Fulton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Roberto v. Stebbins et al
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
James A. Roberto
Defendant:
Debra Stebbins, Olean General Hospital, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto v. Ensell et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
James A. Roberto
Defendant:
Ensell, John Doe and Olean New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griggs v. The Attorney General of the State of New York
as 6:2024cv06039
Petitioner:
Perry Griggs
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Hanick Hall Medical Department
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Antonio Hogan
Defendant:
Hanick Hall Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Wojtaszek et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Dyrek Hall
Respondent:
Caroline Wojtaszek, Doreen Hoffman and Michael Filicetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lincoln v. USA
as 6:2024cv06104
Petitioner:
Matthew D. Lincoln
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Monroe v. U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Grant H. Monroe
Defendant:
U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Farby et al
as 6:2024cv06089
Plaintiff:
Dashawun Wright
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Farby, Corrections Officer Thomas, Corrections Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
