Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,501
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner: Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sago v. USA
as 4:2023cv00492
Petitioner: Kyle Quentin Sago
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Washington v. City of Tulsa, The, et al.
as 4:2023cv00467
Defendant: Jermaine Torrey Washington, City of Tulsa, The, District Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasley v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00446
Petitioner: Tori Lynn Lasley
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Sweat
as 4:2023cv00417
Petitioner: Shayna Lauren Sims
Respondent: Christe Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cato v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00387
Petitioner: Timothy Shawn Cato
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Guten et al
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff: Christopher J Barnett
Defendant: David Guten and Scott Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hershberger et al
as 4:2023cv00439
Plaintiff: Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant: Edwin Hershberger, Mike Reed, Damon Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wanjiku v. Boggess
as 4:2023cv00363
Petitioner: Erick Wanjiku
Respondent: Gary Boggess and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. USA
as 4:2023cv00454
Petitioner: Amanda Lyn Walker
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?