Cases 81 - 90 of 320
Young v. Tulsa New Holland, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
Charles R Young
Defendant:
Tulsa New Holland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hubbard v. Latshaw Drilling Company, LLC
as 4:2013cv00648
Plaintiff:
William Hubbard
Defendant:
Latshaw Drilling Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Blaylock v. Western Flyer Express
as 5:2013cv00980
Plaintiff:
Darrell Blaylock
Defendant:
Western Flyer Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooper v. Matrix Service Company et al
as 4:2013cv00584
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cooper
Defendant:
Matrix Service Company and Matrix Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Lawlis v. Moore Iron & Steele Corp
as 5:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
David Lawlis
Defendant:
Moore Iron & Steele Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Blackwell v. Mid-Continent Concrete Company, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00493
Plaintiff:
Talana Blackwell
Defendant:
Mid-Continent Concrete Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Kauk v. Department of Tourism and Recreation
as 5:2013cv00657
Plaintiff:
Marsha D Kauk
Defendant:
Department of Tourism and Recreation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rockey v. High Mountain Oil Services, LLC et al
as 6:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rockey
Defendant:
High Mountain Oil Services, LLC and Mark McAlister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Reddick v. American HomePatient, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
April Reddick
Defendant:
American HomePatient, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Zinno v. Concentra Health Services Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Tina Zinno
Defendant:
Concentra Health Services Inc and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
