Cases 81 - 90 of 488
LOTT v. HARVARD COLLECTION SERVICES INC
as 5:2019cv00517
Defendant:
HARVARD COLLECTION SERVICES INC. and HARVARD COLLECTION SERVICES INC
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LOTT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
COOKS v. COLLECTION AND BILLING SERVICES INC
as 1:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY N COOKS
Defendant:
COLLECTION AND BILLING SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOODY v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 5:2020cv00061
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and SYNCHRONY BANK
Plaintiff:
DIANN L MOODY
LOGGINS v. SOUTHERN CREDIT BUREAU CORPORATION DBA CBA
as 5:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
KATHY E LOGGINS and KATHY ELAINE LOGGINS
Defendant:
SOUTHERN CREDIT BUREAU CORPORATION DBA CBA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ATHENS CELLULAR INC v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00001
Defendant:
PATRICK DAVENPORT, RUSSELL EDWARDS, TIM DENSON and others
Plaintiff:
ATHENS CELLULAR INC and ATHENS CELLULAR INC doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES et al v. WILLIAMS
as 5:2019cv00489
Plaintiff:
DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and JUVENILE COURT
Defendant:
ENDYA S'MONE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. PROGRESSIVE RELOCATION SYSTEMS, INC.
as 3:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Margaret Smith
Defendant:
Progressive Relaton Systems, Inc. and PROGRESSIVE RELOCATION SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COTHRON v. LANIER COLLECTION AGENCY & SERVICES, INC.
as 7:2019cv00205
Defendant:
LANIER COLLECTION AGENCY & SERVICES INC
Plaintiff:
TERRI BOATWRIGHT COTHRON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al v. EL
as 5:2019cv00478
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and ABIGAIL COCHRAN
Defendant:
TEZ BEN EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLLOMAN v. GOLDBERG & DONOVAN INC , et al
as 1:2019cv00185
Defendant:
GOLDBERG & DONOVAN INC and STEVEN LOMBARDI
Plaintiff:
KELVIN HOLLOMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
