Cases 81 - 90 of 4,992
Bordeau Metals, LLC et al v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00193
Counter Defendant:
Bordeau Metals, LLC and BB&K Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Floyd County, Georgia, Rome-Floyd County Development Authority and Jamie McCord
Counter Claimant:
Development Authority of Floyd County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Samra et al v. Fortitude Health, LLC et al
as 1:2023mi00093
Plaintiff:
Justin Samra and Healfast, Inc.
Defendant:
Fortitude Health, LLC and UPS International
Njie v. Ndong-Njie
as 1:2023cv04957
Petitioner:
Alieu Njie
Respondent:
Fatou Ndong-Njie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Appt. of Receiver
as 1:2023mi00099
Receiver:
Matthew D. Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Appointment of Receiver
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2023cv04516
Plaintiff:
RMS of Georgia, LLC doing business as Choice Refrigerants
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
CMH Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neil et al
as 1:2023mi00097
Plaintiff:
CMH Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Servais Evrard Neil and BPN Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Weaver v. US Inspector General for Post Office
as 1:2023mi00098
Plaintiff:
Vershun Weaver
Defendant:
US Inspector General for Post Office
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Harper v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv04626
Plaintiff:
Nicole Michelle Harper
Defendant:
Pamela Johnson and Every Federal Employee That is in a Federal Cell Charged for Nicole Michelle Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Duhart v. Kristan
as 1:2023cv04020
Plaintiff:
Jovan M. Duhart
Defendant:
Taylor Kristan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
