Cases 41 - 50 of 6,909
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03122
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv03223
Plaintiff:
JENNY SMITH and JERRY SMITH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE LYNN FLEMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI DANBURY and BALTIMORE RRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOQADDEM v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
MAHA MOQADDEM
Respondent:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT and SUPERIOR STATE COURT OF CALIFORNIA AIRPORT COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, CENTURY REGIONAL DET FACILITY, ANGELA D. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPHARD v. HOPKINS et al
as 1:2023cv03129
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOHN HOPKINS, DENNIS KONICKI, ARRON REGGINAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
as 1:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
ROY JACKSON
Defendant:
ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03039
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ ZAPATA
as 1:2023cv03320
Petitioner:
JUAN J. HERNANDEZ ZAPATA
Respondent:
WILLIAMSBURG CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
