Cases 71 - 80 of 1,056
Keliihoomalu v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Rein Keliihoomalu
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Shannon Bautista, Dwayne Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kaneakua v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Elijah Maluhia Kaneakua
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Kris Robl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lu v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ti Lu
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Dr. Kwon and S. Mulitalo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Munoz v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jose Munoz
Defendant:
Ms. Estella Derr and Dwayne Bautista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tabaoda v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tabaoda
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Shawn Tabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marler v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marler
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Dr. Pysh, Ms. L. Lazo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villegas-Escobar v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Villegas-Escobar
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Nathan Kwon, M.D., Kevin Robl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aipoalani v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Hanalei Yukutaru Aipoalani
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Nathan Kwon and Kevin Robl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ah Puck, Jr. v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracy Jones, Maui Intake Service Center, Jennifer and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watanabe v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kekai Watanabe
Defendant:
Estela Derr, Mr. K. Robl, Nurse Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
