Cases 1 - 10 of 2,066
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RIVERA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
CARMELO RIVERA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ramos v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ramos
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
THOMPSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05945
Plaintiff:
DENISE LYNN THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
AVIGLIANO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05851
Plaintiff:
ELLEN AVIGLIANO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
AVIGLIANO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05851
Plaintiff:
ELLEN AVIGLIANO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
RAGBEER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05817
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA RAGBEER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CARR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05746
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CALA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
JEROME CALA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DEJESUS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05290
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEJESUS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
