Cases 31 - 40 of 4,395
Artist Growth, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Artist Growth, Inc.
Defendant:
Garrett Lee and Jacquelyn McGuire
McCain v. Fitzgerald
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Tyler McCain
Defendant:
Bryan Fitzgerald doing business as Marathon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fair Debt Collection Act
Gilliam v. Affordable Health Solutions Inc.
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
William Steven Gilliam
Defendant:
Affordable Health Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
John Doe #1 (EDB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (EDB) and John Doe #2 (WEB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fair Debt Collection Act
John Doe # 1 (BLB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Doe # 1 (BLB), John Doe #2 (EDH), John Doe #32 (RAK) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEP Administrative Services, LLC v. Wiseman
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
GEP Administrative Services, LLC doing business as Entertainment Partners
Defendant:
Melissa Wiseman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
