Cases 1 - 10 of 100
HWH, LLC v. ACUITY, A Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv03075
Plaintiff:
HWH, LLC
Defendant:
ACUITY, A Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr - Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ea - Removal - Employment Discrimination (Age)
Derron (PS) v. Polis et al
as 1:2026cv03072
Plaintiff:
Earl William's Derron
Defendant:
Polis, Wiggings, Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruede v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv03076
Plaintiff:
Tamara D. Ruede
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing, SSAOGCOMMS and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Embark Consulting, LLC v. Global Air Mobility, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03069
Plaintiff:
Embark Consulting, LLC
Defendant:
Global Air Mobility, Inc. and Eugene Haggan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Sobin (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2026cv03074
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sobin
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Phil Weiser and Michael Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brady v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03073
Plaintiff:
Lyris Brady
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Maheu (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2026cv03078
Plaintiff:
Garrett Wayne Maheu
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Brien v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv03064
Plaintiff:
Maureen O'Brien
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
