Cases 131 - 140 of 2,540
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hueter et al v. AST Telecomm LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Faamuli Pete Faamuli and Michael S. Kirk
Defendant:
AST Telecomm LLC d/b/a Bluesky Communications, Raj Deo, Paul Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Lendlease (US) Construction Inc. v. China Oceanwide Holdings Limited (OPENED IN ERROR, REFER TO MC 21-00326 DKW-KJM)
as 1:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Lendlease (US) Construction Inc.
Defendant:
China Oceanwide Holdings Limited
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pierce v. Connors et al
as 1:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pierce
Defendant:
Clare Connors, David Ige and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hueter et al v. Haaland et al
as 1:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Michael S. Kirk, Tao and others
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland, Gina Raimondo, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Hoopono-Services for the Blind v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Ho'opono - Services for the Blind
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of the Army and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
