Cases 91 - 100 of 616
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINATOA et al
as 2:2018cv11122
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CRISTOBAL QUINATOA and ANA VALLADARES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv10276
Plaintiff:
MARIA L RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEMAIO et al
as 1:2018cv08924
Defendant:
JOSEPH DEMAIO, SUN NATIONAL BANK N.A., UNITED TELECONNECT INC. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEO
as 2:2018cv07574
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. LEO
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
THORPE et al v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 2:2018cv04956
Plaintiff:
RHANDALL J. THORPE and BARBARA J. THORPE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, PHILLIP DUN, DEBRA HAYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRAS et al
as 3:2018cv04555
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY PATRAS, RUTH PATRAS and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BONITZ et al
as 3:2018cv04103
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR BONITZ, WENDY BONITZ, GLEN ARDEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARGULIA et al
as 3:2018cv03171
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JANET CARGULIA, ANDREW CARGULIA and COLUMBIA BANK
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2018cv02622
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ABRAHAM TAYLOR and CHENTAY CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America
as 2:2018cv02520
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
