Cases 161 - 170 of 2,070
BRYANT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv05623
Plaintiff:
KYLE BRYANT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BERNARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2022cv05536
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY C BERNARD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GONZALEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv05377
Plaintiff:
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
EDMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv05119
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE EDMAN
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCCRAKEN v. SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv05070
Plaintiff:
ANDREW A MCCRAKEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PARSONS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv04979
Plaintiff:
Laura Parsons
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
DIAZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv04959
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA DIAZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GAYDOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv04721
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE M GAYDOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and nefusanjssa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
ORITZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv04728
Plaintiff:
ROSE M ORITZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
PARISI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv04730
Plaintiff:
ROSE ANN PARISI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
