US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,338
Sechrist v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00503
Petitioner: Tye A Sechrist
Respondent: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner: Damon Lee Mink
Respondent: Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner: Michael Sean Shook
Respondent: Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner: DeMaurea Davis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Wright
as 5:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Smith
Defendant: FNU Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant: Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff: Edford Ray Nolan, Jr
Defendant: Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00480
Petitioner: Bryan Frank Perry
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner: John Miguel Swan
Respondent: Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christensen v. Amonson et al
as 5:2024cv00479
Plaintiff: John E Christensen
Defendant: Chris Amonson and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?