Tenth Circuit Intellectual Property Cases

Trademark Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,735
ONG Investment v. Furlong et al
as 2:2015cv00368
Plaintiff: ONG Investment
Defendant: Joseph B. Furlong, Radworkers
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
American Covers v. Acet Venture Partners
as 2:2015cv00361
Plaintiff: American Covers
Defendant: Acet Venture Partners
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Select Comfort v. Cattermole et al
as 2:2015cv00342
Plaintiff: Select Comfort
Defendant: Terry Gene Cattermole, Slumber Number
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Sprint Nextel Corporation v. The Middle Man, Inc.
as 15-3108
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant: THE MIDDLE MAN, INC.
Defendant Counterclaimant: BRIAN K. VASQUEZ
Spyderco Inc v. Mambate USA Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00943
Plaintiff: Spyderco Inc
Defendant: Mambate USA Inc, BrainyTrade USA Inc
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Azteca Systems v. UI Labs
as 2:2015cv00315
Plaintiff: Azteca Systems
Defendant: UI Labs
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Power Music v. Step Company, The
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff: Power Music
Defendant: Step Company, The
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Swig Holdings v. Sodalicious
as 2:2015cv00307
Plaintiff: Swig Holdings
Defendant: Sodalicious
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Law v. Bush et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00898
Plaintiff: David Law
Defendant: David Bush , David B Bush LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Wheeler Saxon Labs v. Newyorkderminstitute.org
as 2:2015cv00294
Plaintiff: Wheeler Saxon Labs
Defendant: Newyorkderminstitute.org
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.