US District Court for the District of Colorado Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 15,628
Gartman (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Clinton Gartman
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Jerome N. Rivers
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen and Raymond L. Aigbekaen
Defendant:
USA, Collette Peters, John F. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele (PS) v. Stencil et al
as 1:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Brandon T. Steele
Defendant:
Andre Moses Stencil and Jared Polis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Albert Garza
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Brekke and Rasor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00799
Petitioner:
James E. Frantz
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. RMHS et al
as 1:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Cal Bartis and Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
RMHS, Amsterclam Social Services, DHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson (PS) v. Adams County Jail
as 1:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dennis Grayson
Defendant:
Adams County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Locke
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
Kathrine Locke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milsap (PS) v. People of Colorado
as 1:2024cv00751
Petitioner:
James E. Milsap
Respondent:
People of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
