Colorado Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 15,582
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hill (PS) v. Bradshaw et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Deddrick Hill
Defendant:
Bradshaw and Haughmen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker (PS) v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Joel Baker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollaway (PS) v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
Brian Don Hollaway
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregor (PS) v. Community Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Petitioner:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Respondent:
Community Corrections, Independence House, Arlene Duram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina (PS) v. Bauby
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Delano Medina
Defendant:
August Bauby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seeley (PS) v. County of Denver et al
as 1:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Clarence Wayne Seeley, III and Clarence Seeley, III
Defendant:
County of Denver, City of Denver, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Girard et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson and Kiki Patricia Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
Girard and Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Burnes and Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dimmer (PS) v. USA
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Derneval Dimmer
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
