Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,711
Jordan v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Willie Jordan
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Melissa Waldock, Dan Schnurr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard (ID 6003638) v. Snyder
as 5:2024cv03059
Petitioner:
Marlon Dwane Sheppard
Respondent:
Paul Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodwin v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stewart v. Dominicis et al
as 5:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Stewart
Defendant:
Jorge A. Dominicis, Jerry Boyle, Amie Fabah-Ezeogu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen (ID 79712) v. Facebook et al
as 5:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Instagram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Thompson
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bryant (ID 7323) v. Wichita Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Bryant
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, Kansas, State of, Paul O'Mara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes (ID 105577) v. McClain
as 5:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Christopher McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodley v. (lnu)
as 5:2024cv03053
Petitioner:
Alphonso Woodley
Respondent:
(fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
West v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph West
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) and (fnu) Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
