Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,104
Davis v. Kobach et al
as 5:2023cv03120
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Kris W. Kobach and Daniel L. Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03118
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Kris W. Kobach and Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03115
Petitioner:
Anthony Martin Green
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Quinn (ID 51835) v. Prisoner Review Board
as 5:2023cv03116
Petitioner:
Cletis R. O'Quinn
Respondent:
Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson (ID 104710) v. Williams
as 5:2023cv03112
Petitioner:
Adam Paul Roberson
Respondent:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03109
Petitioner:
Justin Keith
Respondent:
United States of America and D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2023cv03104
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2023cv03103
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strader (ID 66677) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03100
Petitioner:
James C. Strader
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rouls v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03098
Petitioner:
Darkee Shawn Rouls
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.