Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,108
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2023cv03104
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2023cv03103
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strader (ID 66677) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03100
Petitioner:
James C. Strader
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rouls v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03098
Petitioner:
Darkee Shawn Rouls
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGinn (ID 62252) v. Williams
as 5:2023cv03095
Petitioner:
Carlon D. McGinn
Respondent:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03093
Petitioner:
Rodney C. Price
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2023cv03087
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foster (ID 92016) v. Geither et al
as 5:2023cv03089
Petitioner:
Rory Markel Foster and Rory Marcel Foster
Respondent:
Gloria Geither, Jeff Zmuda and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03084
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Kris W. Kobach and Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2023cv03082
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.