US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,178
Melson v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Brian Lee Melson
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pettie v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Cebon Wayne Pettie
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendrix v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Jimmy Glenn Hendrix
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanwoudenberg v. Harvanek
as 4:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Edward John Vanwoudenberg
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alberty v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Farron Whitney Alberty
Respondent:
United States of America, William Rankins and Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Rourke v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Bryan Christopher O'Rourke
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elton v Buss
as 4:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Robert Elton
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luginbyhl v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00269
Petitioner:
Marcus E Lolar
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Barteaux
as 4:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Defendant:
T Luke Barteaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
