US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,284
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff: Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant: Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00274
Petitioner: Phillip Morrison
Respondent: Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Daniels v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00270
Petitioner: David L Daniels
Respondent: FNU Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN et al v. BIDEN
as 5:2024cv00264
Petitioner: David Brian Morgan, Kirk Brogie, Ernest Draper and others
Respondent: Joseph Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ARRINGTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2024cv00265
Plaintiff: Derrek E Arrington
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons and DESIGNATION, SENTENCE, & COMPUTATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Corey Jackson
Defendant: Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner: Lonnie Love
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: Andrew Fields, III
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, D Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Gardner et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Andreil R Berry
Defendant: FNU Gardner and Lawton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Truitt v. OIG et al
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff: Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant: OIG and FNU Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?