US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 168
ABBASI v. BHALODWALA et al
as 5:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD UMER KHAN ABBASI
Defendant:
JIPAL P BHALODWALA , REAL TIME NETWORKING INC and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. SCRUFFY MURPHY'S INC et al
as 4:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , MJ PUBLISHING TRUST , HOUSE OF CASH INC and others
Defendant:
SCRUFFY MURPHY'S INC and BREDA H GLEESON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Peterson v. ADAMS
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charles Peterson
Defendant:
PEGGY SCOTT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. NORTHSIDE RIVARLY'S LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00036
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , SONY/ATV SONGS LLC , THE BERNARD EDWARDS COMPANY LLC and others
Defendant:
NORTHSIDE RIVARLY'S LLC and NICHOLAS E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SUNLUST PICTURES LLC v. PATTERSON
as 3:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
SUNLUST PICTURES LLC
Defendant:
REGINALD PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SUNLUST PICTURES LLC v. STAPLETON
as 1:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
SUNLUST PICTURES LLC
Defendant:
PAUL STAPLETON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SUNLUST PICTURES LLC v. MILLER
as 3:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
SUNLUST PICTURES LLC
Defendant:
JUSTIN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Ltd. v. HUBEI WILD TREES TEXTILES CO LTD et al
as 4:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jordan Outdoor Enterprises, Ltd.
Defendant:
HUBEI WILD TREES TEXTILES CO LTD, WILDFOWLER OUTFITTER INC and THATCHREED LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
AF HOLDINGS LLC v. JACKSON
as 5:2012cv00429
Plaintiff:
AF HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
PERRY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
MARENEM INC v. JUMP
as 5:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
MARENEM INC
Defendant:
DEANNA C JUMP
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
