US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Cbeyond Communications, LLC v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00693
Plaintiff:
Cbeyond Communications, LLC
Defendant:
MCI Communications Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
Moss v. Cronic, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00235
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Moss
Defendant:
Cronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981
Department of Transportation v. 0.250 acres of land and certain access rights et al
as 4:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
0.250 acres of land and certain access rights, North South Rail Road Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fox v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
C. Randall Fox
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crumbley v. Dejuma Auto Hauling, LLC
as 1:2010cv03281
Plaintiff:
Marvin R. Crumbley, III
Defendant:
Dejuma Auto Hauling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14705
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. SP Newsprint Co., LLC
as 1:2010cv02667
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
SP Newsprint Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14705 Interstate Commerce Act/Carmack Amendment
United States of America v. JAK Productions, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02008
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
JAK Productions, Inc. and John Keller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Propex Operating Company, LLC v. Rosedale Transport, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Propex Operating Company, LLC
Defendant:
Rosedale Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14705
United Road Logistics, LLC v. Rhino Auto Transport, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00554
Plaintiff:
United Road Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Rhino Auto Transport, Inc.
United Road Logistics, LLC v. Rhino Auto Transport, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
United Road Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Rhino Auto Transport, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
