Georgia Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,461
Pedraza v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02016
Plaintiff:
David Pedraza
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jackson v. American Honda Finance Corporation
as 1:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Jackson
Defendant:
American Honda Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 501 Violation of Federal Reserve Act
Acevedo v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Juan Acevedo
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Aviles v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01997
Plaintiff:
Omar Aviles
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company v. P23 Labs, LLC
as 1:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Defendant:
P23 Labs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gustafson v. Primis Bank
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Paul Gustafson
Defendant:
Primis Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Target Corporation v. Liberty County Industrial Authority
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Target Corporation
Defendant:
Liberty County Industrial Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
R.N.C. Industries, Inc. v. Evolus, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01953
Plaintiff:
R.N.C. Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Evolus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LJL Holdings Lithonia LLC v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
LJL Holdings Lithonia LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ruff v. DRM Inc.
as 1:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
Alex Ruff
Defendant:
DRM Inc. doing business as Arby's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
