US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 270
HASSAN v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2011cv02189
Plaintiff:
ABDUL KARIM HASSAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
KING GEORGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv02164
Plaintiff:
KING GEORGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF MICHIGAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv01938
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01836
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
MCCONNELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01794
Plaintiff:
GLENN F. MCCONNELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01784
Plaintiff:
NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF GEORGIA v. HOLDER
as 1:2011cv01788
Plaintiff:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF ALABAMA v. HOLDER
as 1:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv01592
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
