US District Court for the Northern District of New York Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,237
Yarusso v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Andrew Yarusso
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gunther v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
David A. Gunther
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chung v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Barrington Yee Chung
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Claudio-Montanez v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Ana Claudio-Montanez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rogofsky v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Rogofsky
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harrison v. Commissoner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Billy Graves Harrison and Karina M. Witherbee
Defendant:
Commissoner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wilcox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Crystal Wilcox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jeter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Phoenix R. Jeter
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Penny v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Tina Dawn Penny
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kisacky v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Rana Kisacky
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
