US District Court for the Western District of New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Harper v. Charter Communications
as 1:2021cv00760
Plaintiff:
Princess M. Harper
Defendant:
Charter Communications
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sanchez v. Village of Wolcott et al
as 6:2021cv06438
Plaintiff:
Amy Sanchez
Defendant:
Village of Wolcott and Otis Vezzose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Fournier et al
as 6:2021cv06171
Defendant:
Clifford Florence, Kevin Brown, Property Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy L. Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conser v. Reidman-Wegman Canandaigua, LLC et al
as 6:2021cv06065
Plaintiff:
Cathy Conser and Cathey Conser
Defendant:
Reidman-Wegman Canandaigua, LLC, BME Associates, UFP New York LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. MIDTOWN MOTEL LLC et al
as 6:2020cv06949
Defendant:
DAVID OLDFIELD, BARBARA OLDFIELD, MIDTOWN MOTEL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Matthews v. HUD et al
as 6:2020cv06944
Defendant:
Inspectors, Section Eight, Rochester Housing Authority and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Alexander Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mugabo v. The Joan Wagner Family et al
as 1:2020cv01390
Defendant:
The Joan Wagner Family and Jimmy Sanders
Plaintiff:
Augustin Mugabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Whitford
as 1:2020cv01149
Plaintiff:
Roger Williams
Defendant:
Harold Whitford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Professional Career Development Institute, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv06328
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas
Defendant:
Distance Education Company and Professional Career Development Institute, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Matthews v. HUD
as 6:2020cv06041
Defendant:
HUD
Plaintiff:
Arthur Alexander Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
