Third Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 14,316
Welch Allyn, Inc. v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Welch Allyn, Inc.
Defendant:
iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Gamehancement LLC v. Irdeto USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Gamehancement LLC
Defendant:
Irdeto USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gamehancement LLC v. Verimatrix, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Gamehancement LLC
Defendant:
Verimatrix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gamehancement LLC v. Verance Corporation
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gamehancement LLC
Defendant:
Verance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gamehancement LLC v. Friend MTS (US) Inc.
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Gamehancement LLC
Defendant:
Friend MTS (US) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Inventive, LLC v. Lift and Tow, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Inventive, LLC
Defendant:
Lift and Tow, LLC, Lift & Tow Industries, LLC and Hidden Lift & Tow LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gamehancement LLC v. Digimarc Corporation
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gamehancement LLC
Defendant:
Digimarc Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al v. Opsens Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips N.V. and IP2IPO Innovations, Ltd.
Defendant:
Haemonetics Corporation, OpSens Inc., OpSens Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
CUPP Cybersecurity LLC et al v. Symantec Corporation
as 1:2024cv00202
Defendant:
NortonLifeLock Inc. and Symantec Corporation
Plaintiff:
CUPP Cybersecurity LLC and CUPP Computing AS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
David Catanzaro v. Walmart.com, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. CATANZARO
Defendant:
WALMART.COM and WALMART INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
