Third Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,562
Comer v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Comer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ramos v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ramos
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
THOMPSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05945
Plaintiff:
DENISE LYNN THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
AVIGLIANO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05851
Plaintiff:
ELLEN AVIGLIANO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
HOOPER v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01900
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOHN HOOPER
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hartman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Rebecca K. Hartman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
AVIGLIANO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05851
Plaintiff:
ELLEN AVIGLIANO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
GIORDANO v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. COMMISSIONER
as 2:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W GIORDANO, SR
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hooks v. SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Amira K Hooks
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
