Third Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 86,749
In re: David Turner
as 24-1848
Petitioner: In re: DAVID TURNER
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
USA v. Juan Montas
as 24-1851
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JUAN MONTAS, also known as Juan Miguel Montas also knowns as Juan Montas Hilario also known as Juan Hilario
In re: Alex Lovejoy
as 24-1869
Petitioner: In re: ALEX LOVEJOY
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
USA v. James Leroy
as 24-1841
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES MARK LEROY
USA v. Tamir Douglas
as 24-1850
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TAMIR DOUGLAS
Liu et al v. EB5 Global SF, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff: Nan Liu, Hao Liu, Guangxiang Xu and others
Defendant: EB5 Global SF, LLC, MiMA Real Estate Partners I, LLC, Renoir HM, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05920
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. NICHOLAS SERVICES, LLC.
as 3:2024cv05917
Petitioner: LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent: NICHOLAS SERVICES, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
HABIB et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv05923
Plaintiff: EMAD HABIB, VIVIAN MESHRKY, ANDREW HABIB and others
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ibrahim Ibrahim v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1875
Petitioner: IBRAHIM NASR IBRAHIM
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?