New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 18,916
RIZK v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv05575
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRADLEY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05126
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RECANATI v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv05131
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ANTHONY RECANATI
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF BERGEN, MICHAEL ALBANESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIRIANI v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH SIRIANI
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN, MARC SIRE, U.C.H.C. UNIVERSITY CORR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILTON v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04983
Petitioner:
SAMUELS MILTON
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLOCKER v. ACPD et al
as 1:2024cv05498
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ACPD and ALEY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv05500
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
CHERYL LNU, KELLY WARDER and CAPTAIN MADLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. JOHN DOE 1-3
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. TORRES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv04853
Petitioner:
SPENCER YOUNG
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
