US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,301
BOYD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
TRAYVONE TYRELL BOYD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Heck v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Ms. Melanie Heck
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bailey v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Ms. Susan Bailey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MITCHELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MITCHELL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
Lafonda Charnetta Henderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GONZALEZ v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
ANGEL GONZALEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GROFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER GROFF
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Busch v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. COMMISSIONER
as 2:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Alice Marie Busch
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HARRIS v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
EUGENE EUGENE HARRIS
Defendant:
Commissioner MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
