US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 19,416
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
COLE v. AFFLUENT ADS LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA COLE
Defendant:
AFFLUENT ADS LLC doing business as LEADNOMICS and RAPID RESPONSE MARKETING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE v. Ashford Tipton Lakes LP et al
as 2:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE
Defendant:
Ashford Tipton Lakes LP, Ashford Phoenix Airport LP, Ashford Hawthorne LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE v. Ashford Tipton Lakes LP et al
as 2:2024mc00013
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE
Defendant:
Ashford Tipton Lakes LP, Ashford Phoenix Airport LP, Ashford Hawthorne LP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
