US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,651
O'REILLY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv05188
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH O'REILLY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
EVANS v. THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
CHERYL EVANS
Defendant:
THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. doing business as GENSIGHT and MICHAEL MENARD
CLARY v. BRETT SABOL PLUMBING & HEATING, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05053
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLARY
Defendant:
BRETT SABOL PLUMBING & HEATING, LLC and BRETT T. SABOL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
BROOKS v. SAME DAY DELIVERY, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04977
Plaintiff:
TYHEA BROOKS
Defendant:
SAME DAY DELIVERY, INC. and FEDERAL EXPRESS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
SU v. JACK PEARS & ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04921
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
JACK PEARS & ASSOCIATES, LLC and ALLEN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WARLOW v. BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. et al
as 5:2023cv04794
Plaintiff:
ADAM WARLOW
Defendant:
BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. and JAMES NODEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SU v. INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv04504
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, INC. and KYLE FISCHL
v. INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04503
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, LLC and KYLE FISCHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
ABOUAKIL v. BLAZE AUTO, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04480
Plaintiff:
NADA ABOUAKIL
Defendant:
BLAZE AUTO, LLC doing business as AUTO OUTLET OF PA and STEPHEN SILVERIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
COUSINS v. 1222 LOGISTICS, LLC.
as 2:2023cv04223
Plaintiff:
IMANI T. COUSINS
Defendant:
1222 LOGISTICS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
