Third Circuit Cases

Cases filed

Cases 11 - 20 of 450,311
USA v. Brandon Wright
as 15-2267
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BRANDON WRIGHT, a/k/a Bones
USA v. William Dahl
as 15-2271
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM S. DAHL
In re: NFL Players Concussion
as 15-2272
Plaintiff - Appellee: KEVIN TURNER, Subclass 2 Representative, SHAWN WOODEN, Subclass1 Representative
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES
Not Party - Appellant: RAYMOND ARMSTRONG, NATHANIEL NEWTON, JR., LARRY BROWN and others
Movant - Appellant: EVAN OGELSBY
In re: NFL Plyers Concussion
as 15-2273
Plaintiff - Appellee: KEVIN TURNER, Subclass 2 Representative, SHAWN WOODEN, Subclass1 Representative
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES
Not Party - Appellant: LIYONGO PATRISE ALEXANDER, CHARLIE ANDERSON, CHARLES E. ARBUCKLE and others
In re: Curtis Brinson
as 15-2280
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: CURTIS BRINSON
Defendant - Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI
Nominal Respondent: TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
In re: John Corbin
as 15-2284
Petitioner: In re: JOHN LEONARD CORBIN
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03500
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Infovista SA v. Satec Tunisie
as 1:2015cv00417
Plaintiff: Infovista SA
Defendant: Satec Tunisie
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Clark
as 3:2015cv01004
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Heather L. Clark
Cause Of Action: Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03499
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.