Maryland Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,918
South River Mortgage, LLC v. Atlantic Avenue Mortgage et al
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
South River Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
Atlantic Avenue Mortgage, Austin Folsom and Theodore Priester
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
French v. Circuit Court for Montgomery County State of Maryland
as 8:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Crisstofer Michael French, Sr
Defendant:
Circuit Court for Montgomery County State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Tiero, LLC v. SmartScripts LLC
as 8:2024cv00803
Defendant:
Tiero, LLC and SmartScripts LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kolal v. Galen Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Vishnu Kolal
Defendant:
Galen Robotics, Inc. and Bruce Lichorowic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
kilpatrick v. EcoStrategy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Mr. Tyler kilpatrick
Defendant:
EcoStrategy, Inc. and Aaron Beaty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Elevated Assistance, LLC v. EcoStrategy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Elevated Assistance, LLC
Defendant:
EcoStrategy, Inc. and Aaron Beaty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ward v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 1:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Tammy Ward
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corp. and International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Quill v. Conviso Inc.
as 8:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Quill
Defendant:
Conviso Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
DiPietro v. Burgess
as 8:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Richard DiPietro
Defendant:
Keith Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Roger D. Silk v. Baron Bond et al
as 1:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Silk
Defendant:
Baron Bond and Howard B. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
