Maryland Real Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Bennett et al v. Hyundai Motor Company et al
as 8:2018cv01468
Plaintiff:
Darlene Bennett and Kelvin Bennett, Sr
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America Corporation and Kyung Soo Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanch et al v. S.S. VAPE, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00830
Plaintiff:
Luke Stanch and Heather Stanch
Defendant:
S.S. Vape, LLC, ABC Companies. 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Germantown Copy Center, Inc. v. Roger Naaman Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00826
Plaintiff:
Germantown Copy Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Roger Naaman Insurance Services, Inc., Naaman Insurance Agency, Inc., a CA corporation, Naaman Insurance Agency, Inc., a TX corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USAA General Indemnity Company v. General Electric Company
as 1:2018cv00755
Plaintiff:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stafford v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2018cv00708
Plaintiff:
Chad Stafford
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood et al v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02652
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Wood and James Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krimsky v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv02651
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lynette Krimsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roope v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv02522
Plaintiff:
Connie Roope
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melton v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv02509
Consol_plaintiff:
Kenneth Melton
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landis v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv02503
Plaintiff:
David Landis
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
